On Fri, Aug 02 2024 at 09:08, Conor Dooley wrote: > On Thu, Aug 01, 2024 at 08:49:08PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote: >> On Thu, Aug 01 2024 at 16:09, Conor Dooley wrote: >> > On Mon, Jul 29, 2024 at 12:41:25PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote: >> >> > + /* >> >> > + * If a bit is set in the mux, GPIO the corresponding interrupt from >> >> > + * controller 2 is direct and that controllers 0 or 1 is muxed. >> >> >> >> This is not a coherent sentence. >> > >> > It should read "controller 0 or 1;s interrupt is muxed". Does that make > > Heh, I even typoed here, the ; should be a '. > >> > more sense to you? >> >> No: If a bit is set in the mux, GPIO the corresponding... >> >> I'm already failing at 'GPIO'. My parser expects a verb there :) > > Ah, so double mistake in the sentence. s/GPIO// I suppose. An updated > comment could be: > > "If a bit is set in the mux, the corresponding interrupt from GPIO > controller 2 is direct and controller 0 or 1's interrupt is muxed" That's actually understandable for mere mortals :)
