On Thu, Aug 01, 2024 at 08:49:08PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > On Thu, Aug 01 2024 at 16:09, Conor Dooley wrote: > > On Mon, Jul 29, 2024 at 12:41:25PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > >> > + /* > >> > + * If a bit is set in the mux, GPIO the corresponding interrupt from > >> > + * controller 2 is direct and that controllers 0 or 1 is muxed. > >> > >> This is not a coherent sentence. > > > > It should read "controller 0 or 1;s interrupt is muxed". Does that make Heh, I even typoed here, the ; should be a '. > > more sense to you? > > No: If a bit is set in the mux, GPIO the corresponding... > > I'm already failing at 'GPIO'. My parser expects a verb there :) Ah, so double mistake in the sentence. s/GPIO// I suppose. An updated comment could be: "If a bit is set in the mux, the corresponding interrupt from GPIO controller 2 is direct and controller 0 or 1's interrupt is muxed"
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
