RE: [PATCH RESEND] dt-bindings: firmware: arm,scmi: support system power protocol

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Sudeep, Cristian,

> Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND] dt-bindings: firmware: arm,scmi: support
> system power protocol
> 
> On Thu, Jul 18, 2024 at 12:15:20PM +0000, Peng Fan wrote:
> > Hi Sudeep,
> >
> > > Subject: RE: [PATCH RESEND] dt-bindings: firmware: arm,scmi:
> support
> > > system power protocol
> > >
> > > > Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND] dt-bindings: firmware: arm,scmi:
> > > support
> > > > system power protocol
> > > >
> > > > On Fri, Jun 28, 2024 at 11:03:09AM +0800, Peng Fan (OSS) wrote:
> > > > > From: Peng Fan <peng.fan@xxxxxxx>
> > > > >
> > > > > Add SCMI System Power Protocol bindings, and the protocol id
> is
> > > > 0x12.
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > I think we must have this node only if it has dedicated channel or
> > > > any other required property.
> > >
> > > I posted a patchset to support nodes not in device tree. And
> > > Cristian gave some comments:
> > > https://lore.kernel.org/all/Znv1p3FDiPSUNmBM@pluto/
> > >
> >
> > Please suggest what should I do to avoid the dtbs_check issue.
> >
> > Should I switch back to
> > https://lore.kernel.org/all/Znv1p3FDiPSUNmBM@pluto/
> > or else?
> >
> 
> Sorry I need to discuss with Cristain and decide. I might have already
> discussed but I can't recall the details or decision(if any) made after
> that. He is away now, will get back once we discuss and see what is the
> best approach.
> 

Do you have any update on this?

Thanks,
Peng.

> --
> Regards,
> Sudeep





[Index of Archives]     [Device Tree Compilter]     [Device Tree Spec]     [Linux Driver Backports]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux PCI Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Yosemite Backpacking]


  Powered by Linux