On 7/29/24 1:34 AM, Bhavya Kapoor wrote:
There are 2 mux-controller nodes in J7200 which are responsible for
transferring can signals to the can phy but same node names for both
the mux-controllers led to errors while setting up both mux-controllers
for can phys simultaneously.
Thus, update node names for these mux-controller.
Fixes: da23e8d1124b ("arm64: dts: ti: k3-j7200-som-p0: Add support for CAN instance 0 in main domain")
Signed-off-by: Bhavya Kapoor <b-kapoor@xxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Judith Mendez <jm@xxxxxx>
---
arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-j7200-som-p0.dtsi | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-j7200-som-p0.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-j7200-som-p0.dtsi
index 21fe194a5766..89b68325e4e2 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-j7200-som-p0.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-j7200-som-p0.dtsi
@@ -84,13 +84,13 @@ rtos_ipc_memory_region: ipc-memories@a4000000 {
};
};
- mux0: mux-controller {
+ mux0: mux-controller-0 {
compatible = "gpio-mux";
#mux-state-cells = <1>;
mux-gpios = <&exp_som 1 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>;
};
- mux1: mux-controller {
+ mux1: mux-controller-1 {
compatible = "gpio-mux";
#mux-state-cells = <1>;
mux-gpios = <&exp_som 2 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>;
