On 7/30/24 14:00, Rob Herring (Arm) wrote:
Commit 04f08ef291d4 ("arm/arm64: dts: arm: Use generic clock and
regulator nodenames") renamed nodes and created 2 "clock-24000000" nodes
(at different paths). The kernel can't handle these duplicate names
even though they are at different paths. Fix this by renaming one of
the nodes to "clock-pclk". This name is aligned with other Arm boards
(those didn't have a known frequency to use in the node name).
Fixes: 04f08ef291d4 ("arm/arm64: dts: arm: Use generic clock and regulator nodenames")
Reported-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Rob Herring (Arm) <robh@xxxxxxxxxx>
Tested-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
Arnd, I imagine you can take this directly.
arch/arm/boot/dts/arm/versatile-ab.dts | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/arm/versatile-ab.dts b/arch/arm/boot/dts/arm/versatile-ab.dts
index 6fe6b49f5d8e..635ab9268899 100644
--- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/arm/versatile-ab.dts
+++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/arm/versatile-ab.dts
@@ -157,7 +157,7 @@ timclk: clock-1000000 {
clocks = <&xtal24mhz>;
};
- pclk: clock-24000000 {
+ pclk: clock-pclk {
#clock-cells = <0>;
compatible = "fixed-factor-clock";
clock-div = <1>;
