Hi CK,
On Wed, Jul 31, 2024 at 02:59:51AM +0000, CK Hu (胡俊光) wrote:
> On Mon, 2024-07-29 at 16:48 +0200, Julien Stephan wrote:
> > From: Phi-bang Nguyen <pnguyen@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > This driver provides a path to bypass the SoC ISP so that image data
> > coming from the SENINF can go directly into memory without any image
> > processing. This allows the use of an external ISP.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Phi-bang Nguyen <pnguyen@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Signed-off-by: Florian Sylvestre <fsylvestre@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > [Paul Elder fix irq locking]
> > Signed-off-by: Paul Elder <paul.elder@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Co-developed-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Signed-off-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Co-developed-by: Julien Stephan <jstephan@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Signed-off-by: Julien Stephan <jstephan@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
>
> [snip]
>
> > +
> > +static void mtk_cam_cmos_vf_enable(struct mtk_cam_dev *cam_dev,
> > + bool enable, bool pak_en)
> > +{
> > +struct device *dev = cam_dev->dev;
> > +
> > +if (pm_runtime_get_sync(dev) < 0) {
> > +dev_err(dev, "failed to get pm_runtime\n");
> > +goto out;
> > +}
> > +
> > +if (enable)
> > +cam_dev->hw_functions->mtk_cam_cmos_vf_hw_enable(cam_dev);
>
> Directly call mtk_camsv30_cmos_vf_hw_enable().
The goal, when this was developed, was to support multiple generations
of hardware with a single driver. I think it's a worthwhile goal, but at
the same time, I'm not sure that will ever happen as I'm not aware of
plans to upstream Genio 350 and 500 support (which is a bad sad, as it's
more or less working out-of-tree). I'm thus fine either way, and if we
think the most likely outcome is that this driver will only support
Genio 300, I'm fine dropping the abstraction layer.
> > +else
> > +cam_dev->hw_functions->mtk_cam_cmos_vf_hw_disable(cam_dev);
>
> Directly call mtk_camsv30_cmos_vf_hw_disable().
>
> > +
> > +out:
> > +pm_runtime_put_autosuspend(dev);
> > +}
> > +
--
Regards,
Laurent Pinchart
