Hi, On Tue, Jul 30, 2024 at 06:04:12PM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > On 30/07/2024 13:22, arinc.unal@xxxxxxxxxx wrote: > > [...] > > In my view, your behaviour of not applying a devicetree patch before a > > Linux driver patch was applied, and then not replying to any arguments > > whatsoever, was keeping the devicetree files hostage until your demands > > Hm, why ever DTS patch should be applied before driver patch is? This > clearly suggests ABI break. You proposed to fix ABI issue by fixing DTS, > which is not the way, because it literally fixes nothing. You got > comments - fix the driver to be backwards compatible. I've suggested a fix for the driver here: https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/netdevbpf/patch/f485d1d4f7b34cc2ebf3d60030d1c67b4016af3c.1720107535.git.daniel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx/ It has been tested and acknowledged by Arinc, hence a possible solution would be to apply it and there by restore compatibility with existing (broken) device trees.
