Am Donnerstag, 11. Juli 2024, 01:21:15 CEST schrieb Stephen Boyd: > Quoting Heiko Stübner (2024-07-10 00:45:17) > > Am Mittwoch, 10. Juli 2024, 09:02:34 CEST schrieb Alexander Stein: > > > > > > So essentially only enable-gpios and vdd-supply is added in comparison to > > > fixed-clock. Does it make sense to add that to the fixed-clocks instead? > > > Similar to fixed-regulator. > > > > I wasn't that sure which way to go in the first place. > > The deciding point was reading that line about the fixed clock not > > being gateable, so I opted to not touch the fixed-clock. > > > > But you're definitly right, this _could_ live inside the fixed-clock > > as well, if we decide to get rid of the not-gateable thing above. > > It's probably more complicated to combine it with the fixed-clock > binding after making properties required like vdd-supply. I'd just make > a new binding and look at combining later. Maybe I am missing something IMHO adding optional vdd-supply and enable-gpios doesn't seem a big deal. Anyway I don't have a hard opinion here. To me fixed-clocks still seems very appropriate for having a controlling GPIO and power supply. I just would get rid of the (comment only) hint they are ungatable. Best regards, Alexander -- TQ-Systems GmbH | Mühlstraße 2, Gut Delling | 82229 Seefeld, Germany Amtsgericht München, HRB 105018 Geschäftsführer: Detlef Schneider, Rüdiger Stahl, Stefan Schneider http://www.tq-group.com/
