Hello Bjorn,
the apq8960 is just mental typo due to dealing with apq8064 code at same
time. I sent properly named patch [1] with your description and Dmitry's
R-b.
Thank you
David
[1] `ARM: dts: qcom: msm8960: correct memory base`
On 06/07/2024 13:05, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
On Sat, Jul 06, 2024 at 12:34:07PM GMT, David Heidelberg wrote:
Bootloader will provide the information anyway to the kernel.
How about we describe an actual problem here?
Perhaps this is the problem you're solving?:
"""
DeviceTree validation requires a unit address on the memory node, adjust
the base to match [Ref] and use this as unit address.
The bootloader will update the information with the actual values during
boot.
"""
I'd also prefer s/apq8960/msm8960/ in $subject, is there a reason why
you did choose apq8960?
Regards,
Bjorn
Ref: https://github.com/msm8916-mainline/lk2nd/blob/main/target/msm8960/rules.mk
Signed-off-by: David Heidelberg <david@xxxxxxx>
---
arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom/qcom-msm8960.dtsi | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git ./arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom/qcom-msm8960.dtsi ./arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom/qcom-msm8960.dtsi
index a9c6d2dbb460..ebc43c5c6e5f 100644
--- ./arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom/qcom-msm8960.dtsi
+++ ./arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom/qcom-msm8960.dtsi
@@ -47,9 +47,9 @@ L2: l2-cache {
};
};
- memory {
+ memory@80000000 {
device_type = "memory";
- reg = <0x0 0x0>;
+ reg = <0x80000000 0>;
};
cpu-pmu {
--
2.45.2
--
David Heidelberg
