On 6. Jul 2024, at 06:15, Christian Zigotzky wrote:
Our tester has tested the second irq patch again and the kernel boots. We will test it again to be sure that it really works. ;-)
Second irq patch:
diff --git a/drivers/of/irq.c b/drivers/of/irq.c
index 462375b293e47..c94203ce65bb3 100644
--- a/drivers/of/irq.c
+++ b/drivers/of/irq.c
@@ -81,7 +81,8 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(of_irq_find_parent);
/*
* These interrupt controllers abuse interrupt-map for unspeakable
* reasons and rely on the core code to *ignore* it (the drivers do
- * their own parsing of the property).
+ * their own parsing of the property). The PAsemi entry covers a
+ * non-sensical interrupt-map that is better left ignored.
*
* If you think of adding to the list for something *new*, think
* again. There is a high chance that you will be sent back to the
@@ -95,6 +96,7 @@ static const char * const of_irq_imap_abusers[] = {
"fsl,ls1043a-extirq",
"fsl,ls1088a-extirq",
"renesas,rza1-irqc",
+ "pasemi,rootbus",
NULL,
};
@@ -293,20 +295,8 @@ int of_irq_parse_raw(const __be32 *addr, struct of_phandle_args *out_irq)
imaplen -= imap - oldimap;
pr_debug(" -> imaplen=%d\n", imaplen);
}
- if (!match) {
- if (intc) {
- /*
- * The PASEMI Nemo is a known offender, so
- * let's only warn for anyone else.
- */
- WARN(!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PPC_PASEMI),
- "%pOF interrupt-map failed, using interrupt-controller\n",
- ipar);
- return 0;
- }
-
+ if (!match)
goto fail;
- }
/*
* Successfully parsed an interrupt-map translation; copy new
-----
Great news! Our tester has tested this second irq patch again and it boots.
Link: https://forum.hyperion-entertainment.com/viewtopic.php?p=58632#p58632
We will use this patch for the kernel 6.10-rc7.
- - Christian
