On 7/5/24 08:57, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 04/07/2024 22:02, Adam Skladowski wrote:
>> For now example list snoc_mm as children of bimc which is obviously
>> not valid, drop snoc and snoc_mm and leave bimc alone.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Adam Skladowski <a39.skl@xxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>> .../bindings/interconnect/qcom,msm8939.yaml | 13 +------------
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 12 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/interconnect/qcom,msm8939.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/interconnect/qcom,msm8939.yaml
>> index fd15ab5014fb..3aed8b77f35d 100644
>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/interconnect/qcom,msm8939.yaml
>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/interconnect/qcom,msm8939.yaml
>> @@ -56,19 +56,8 @@ examples:
>> - |
>> #include <dt-bindings/clock/qcom,rpmcc.h>
>>
>> - snoc: interconnect@580000 {
>> - compatible = "qcom,msm8939-snoc";
> The one correct example would be the snoc, because it is the most
> complete, but well...
>
> Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
>
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
>
Will do it for v3 so this r-b ain't going to be carried.
