On 04/07/2024 22:02, Adam Skladowski wrote:
> For now example list snoc_mm as children of bimc which is obviously
> not valid, drop snoc and snoc_mm and leave bimc alone.
>
> Signed-off-by: Adam Skladowski <a39.skl@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> .../bindings/interconnect/qcom,msm8939.yaml | 13 +------------
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 12 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/interconnect/qcom,msm8939.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/interconnect/qcom,msm8939.yaml
> index fd15ab5014fb..3aed8b77f35d 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/interconnect/qcom,msm8939.yaml
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/interconnect/qcom,msm8939.yaml
> @@ -56,19 +56,8 @@ examples:
> - |
> #include <dt-bindings/clock/qcom,rpmcc.h>
>
> - snoc: interconnect@580000 {
> - compatible = "qcom,msm8939-snoc";
The one correct example would be the snoc, because it is the most
complete, but well...
Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxx>
Best regards,
Krzysztof
