On 05/07/2024 10:51, Tao Zhang wrote: > Add a new property "filter_src" to label the source corresponding > to the output connection for a static replicator. By combining > a funnel and a static replicator in devicetree, a new device that > supports multi-port input and multi-port output is implemented. > In order to match the output port with the input port and > successfully build the trace path, add this new property to > indicate the data source corresponding to this output port. > > Signed-off-by: Tao Zhang <quic_taozha@xxxxxxxxxxx> > --- > .../arm/arm,coresight-static-replicator.yaml | 18 +++++++++++++++++- > 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/arm,coresight-static-replicator.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/arm,coresight-static-replicator.yaml > index 1892a091ac35..d9538563f9c6 100644 > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/arm,coresight-static-replicator.yaml > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/arm,coresight-static-replicator.yaml > @@ -45,7 +45,21 @@ properties: > patternProperties: > '^port@[01]$': > description: Output connections to CoreSight Trace bus > - $ref: /schemas/graph.yaml#/properties/port > + $ref: /schemas/graph.yaml#/$defs/port-base > + > + properties: > + endpoint: > + $ref: /schemas/media/video-interfaces.yaml# Ehm? How is this video interface? > + > + properties: > + filter_src: There are no properties with underscores... > + $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/phandle > + description: > + defines a phandle reference to an associated CoreSight trace device. > + When the associated trace device is enabled, then the respective > + trace path will be built and enabled. How does it differ from remote endpoint? What is "respective trace path"? <form letter> Please use scripts/get_maintainers.pl to get a list of necessary people and lists to CC (and consider --no-git-fallback argument). It might happen, that command when run on an older kernel, gives you outdated entries. Therefore please be sure you base your patches on recent Linux kernel. Tools like b4 or scripts/get_maintainer.pl provide you proper list of people, so fix your workflow. Tools might also fail if you work on some ancient tree (don't, instead use mainline) or work on fork of kernel (don't, instead use mainline). Just use b4 and everything should be fine, although remember about `b4 prep --auto-to-cc` if you added new patches to the patchset. </form letter> Best regards, Krzysztof
