On Sun, Jun 30, 2024 at 12:08:20PM +0530, Kanak Shilledar wrote: > implemented basic spi support for TH1520 SoC. > created a fixed clock and a simple spi0 node. > updated the matching binding to include thead,th1520-spi as compatible. > added a spidev device in devicetree which will utilise the spi0 node. > this is usually reserved for a SPI NOR flash which is left unpopulated > underneath the carrier board. I performed a SPI self loop test using > tools/spi/spidev_test.c and tried sending `\xDE\xAD\xBE\xEF` and verified > it is being received correctly. i updated the of_device_id struct in > drivers/spi/spi-dw-mmio.c to include "thead,th1520-spi" as the compatible. > this patch also adds basic spi support on beaglev ahead which shares the > same TH1520 SoC. i have only tested on LicheePi 4A. > > Signed-off-by: Kanak Shilledar <kanakshilledar@xxxxxxxxx> > --- > .../devicetree/bindings/spi/snps,dw-apb-ssi.yaml | 4 ++++ > .../boot/dts/thead/th1520-beaglev-ahead.dts | 9 +++++++++ > .../boot/dts/thead/th1520-lichee-module-4a.dtsi | 4 ++++ > .../riscv/boot/dts/thead/th1520-lichee-pi-4a.dts | 10 ++++++++++ > arch/riscv/boot/dts/thead/th1520.dtsi | 16 ++++++++++++++++ > drivers/spi/spi-dw-mmio.c | 1 + This needs to be 3 different patches - one for the binding, one for the driver and a final one for the dts files. > + > +&spi0 { > + status = "okay"; > + spidev@0 { "spidev" is not a type of device, the nodename should match the type. > + compatible = "rohm,dh2228fv"; > + reg = <0>; > + spi-max-frequency = <500000>; > + }; > +}; I'll put money on you not having a dh2228fv on this board. Document what you actually have on it please, not what allows you to probe the spidev driver in linux. Thanks, Conor.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature