On Wed, Mar 04, 2015 at 09:56:24AM +0200, Jyri Sarha wrote: > On 03/03/2015 05:34 PM, Mark Brown wrote: > >>I am wondering if there would be some better way to select the dai-link > >>configuration than writing it to DT or creating a custom machine driver for > >>each setup. > Continuing this tought. I wonder if it would be better to introduce a new > compatible match for each new card, with some clever way to manage the > accumulating matches in the code, and hard code DAI-link configurations for > each match. This way the old configurations would not be carved to stone in > the old dtbs. I would prefer that, yes - if only for override capability. > As there is a proper way to deal with this, I'll look into that first. > However, if there still is a need for these properties I am happy to finish > the patch. OK, a proper fix is of course better. Might be worth looking at tooling to make it easier to find/use but IIRC there's not a lot doing there.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
