>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3588s-khadas-edge2.dts b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3588s-khadas-edge2.dts
>> index 3b6286461a746..f674deb6f7da8 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3588s-khadas-edge2.dts
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3588s-khadas-edge2.dts
>> @@ -356,6 +356,22 @@ &pcie2x1l2 {
>> reset-gpios = <&gpio3 RK_PD1 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>;
>> vpcie3v3-supply = <&vcc3v3_pcie_wl>;
>> status = "okay";
>> +
>> + pcie@0,0 {
>> + reg = <0x400000 0 0 0 0>;
>> + #address-cells = <3>;
>> + #size-cells = <2>;
>> + ranges;
>> + device_type = "pci";
>> + bus-range = <0x40 0x4f>;
>
>Isn't bus-range a property of PCI host bridge, so the parent? This is a
>PCI device, right?
>
>> +
>> + wifi: wifi@0,0 {
>
>Binding does not say anything about this. Rockchip PCI controller is the
>PCI host bridge, isn't it? Then the pci@0,0 is the child, so what is this?
The host bridge is the parent of pcie@0,0. And pcie@0,0 is Bridge1, so the
wifi@0,0 as a device under the Bridge1.
>
>> + reg = <0x410000 0 0 0 0>;
>> + clocks = <&hym8563>;
>> + clock-names = "32k";
>
>1. Bindings are before the users.
>2. Where is the compatible? Are you sure this validates?
Before, the compatible is "pci14e4,449d", but when I checkpatch the warning
said that "pci14e4" was not documented, so I remove the compatible which
doesn't affect the Wi-Fi function. I have tried to add "pci14e4" to
vendor-prefixes.yaml but was refused. So whether should I add the compatible
with warning?
References:
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20220629155956.1138955-15-nfraprado@xxxxxxxxxxxxx/
---
Best Regards
Jacobe
