Re: [PATCH 3/5] arm-cci: Get rid of secure transactions for PMU driver

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On 03/03/15 15:44, Sudeep Holla wrote:


On 02/03/15 11:29, Suzuki K. Poulose wrote:
From: "Suzuki K. Poulose" <suzuki.poulose@xxxxxxx>

Avoid secure transactions while probing the CCI PMU. The
existing code makes use of the Peripheral ID2 (PID2) register
to determine the revision of the CCI400, which requires a
secure transaction. This puts a limitation on the usage of the
driver on systems running non-secure Linux(e.g, ARM64).

Updated the device-tree binding for cci pmu node to add the explicit
revision number for the compatible field.

The supported strings are :
	arm,cci-400-pmu,r0
	arm,cci-400-pmu,r1
	arm,cci-400-pmu - DEPRECATED. See NOTE below

NOTE: If the revision is not mentioned, we need to probe the cci revision,
which could be fatal on a platform running non-secure. We need a reliable way
to know if we can poke the CCI registers at runtime on ARM32. We depend on
'mcpm_is_available()' when it is available. mcpm_is_available() returns true
only when there is a registered driver for mcpm. Otherwise, we assume that we
don't have secure access, and skips probing the revision number(ARM64 case).

The MCPM should figure out if it is safe to access the CCI. Unfortunately
there isn't a reliable way to indicate the same via dtb. This patch doesn't
address/change the current situation. It only deals with the CCI-PMU, leaving
the assumptions about the secure access as it has been, prior to this patch.

Cc: devicetree@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Cc: Punit Agrawal <punit.agrawal@xxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Suzuki K. Poulose <suzuki.poulose@xxxxxxx>
---
   Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/cci.txt |    7 +++--
   arch/arm/include/asm/arm-cci.h                |   42 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
   arch/arm64/include/asm/arm-cci.h              |   27 ++++++++++++++++
   drivers/bus/arm-cci.c                         |   17 +++++++++-
   include/linux/arm-cci.h                       |    2 ++
   5 files changed, 92 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
   create mode 100644 arch/arm/include/asm/arm-cci.h
   create mode 100644 arch/arm64/include/asm/arm-cci.h


[...]

diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/arm-cci.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/arm-cci.h
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..936e74a
--- /dev/null
+++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/arm-cci.h
@@ -0,0 +1,42 @@
+/*
+ * arch/arm/include/asm/arm-cci.h
+ *
+ * Copyright (C) 2015 ARM Ltd.
+ *
+ * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
+ * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 2 as
+ * published by the Free Software Foundation.
+ *
+ * This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
+ * but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
+ * MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.  See the
+ * GNU General Public License for more details.
+ *
+ * You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
+ * along with this program.  If not, see <http://www.gnu.org/licenses/>.
+ */
+
+#ifndef __ASM_ARM_CCI_H
+#define __ASM_ARM_CCI_H
+
+#ifdef CONFIG_MCPM
+#include <asm/mcpm.h>
+
+/*
+ * We don't have a reliable way of detecting whether,
+ * if we have access to secure-only registers, unless
+ * mcpm is registered.
+ */
+static inline int platform_has_secure_cci_access(void)

bool instead of int might be more apt here ?

Yes, I will do that in the next revision.

Thanks
Suzuki

Regards,
Sudeep



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Device Tree Compilter]     [Device Tree Spec]     [Linux Driver Backports]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux PCI Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Yosemite Backpacking]
  Powered by Linux