On 18/06/2024 18:02, Konrad Dybcio wrote: > > > On 6/18/24 17:43, Sibi Sankar wrote: >> Document X1E80100 BWMONs, which has multiple (one per cluster) BWMONv4 >> instances for the CPU->LLCC path and one BWMONv5 instance for LLCC->DDR >> path. Also make the opp-table optional for the X1E cpu-bwmon instances, >> since they use the same opp-table between them. >> >> Signed-off-by: Sibi Sankar <quic_sibis@xxxxxxxxxxx> >> --- > > I think we can just drop the opp-table child node from required altogether, > bindings shouldn't care about where the OPP table (which is referenced in > the operating-points-v2 property) comes from I agree. Best regards, Krzysztof