Re: [PATCH 4/4] regulator: qcom: Rework to single platform device

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On Tue, Mar 03, 2015 at 04:01:43PM -0800, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> On 03/03/15 15:52, Mark Brown wrote:

> > ...but of course we'd never try any operations on it anyway as there
> > would be no consumers.

> Yes sounds fine. The only concern is that we're probably wasting memory
> with things that won't ever "match" something in DT.

You still get diagnostic output about what the regulator state is which
is useful in itself and the amount of memory involved is really not
enough to worry about in the grand scheme of things.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


[Index of Archives]     [Device Tree Compilter]     [Device Tree Spec]     [Linux Driver Backports]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux PCI Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Yosemite Backpacking]
  Powered by Linux