On Tue 03 Mar 10:56 PST 2015, Stephen Boyd wrote: > On 03/02/15 20:25, Bjorn Andersson wrote: > > + > > +static int rpm_reg_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > > +{ > > + struct regulator_init_data *initdata; > > + const struct qcom_rpm_reg *template; > > + const struct of_device_id *match; > > + struct regulator_config config = { }; > > + struct regulator_dev *rdev; > > + struct qcom_rpm_reg *vreg; > > + const char *key; > > + u32 val; > > + int ret; > > + > > + match = of_match_device(rpm_of_match, &pdev->dev); > > + template = match->data; > > + > > + vreg = devm_kmalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*vreg), GFP_KERNEL); > > + if (!vreg) { > > + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "failed to allocate vreg\n"); > > We don't need error messages on allocation failures. > Right, it's just that I wanted to keep these patches free from any unrelated changes. I can add an extra patch at the end removing this and moving the retrieval of rpm out of the for loop. > > + return -ENOMEM; > > + } Regards, Bjorn -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html