On 05/04/2024 14:30, Dinh Nguyen wrote:
> On 4/1/24 09:10, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> Flash node uses single "partition" node to describe partitions, so
>> remove deprecated address/size-cells properties to also fix dtc W=1
>> warnings:
>>
>> socfpga_stratix10_socdk.dts:182.10-211.4: Warning (avoid_unnecessary_addr_size): /soc@0/spi@ff8d2000/flash@0: unnecessary #address-cells/#size-cells without "ranges" or child "reg" property
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>> arch/arm64/boot/dts/altera/socfpga_stratix10_socdk.dts | 2 --
>> 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/altera/socfpga_stratix10_socdk.dts b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/altera/socfpga_stratix10_socdk.dts
>> index 26173f0b0051..4eee777ef1a1 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/altera/socfpga_stratix10_socdk.dts
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/altera/socfpga_stratix10_socdk.dts
>> @@ -180,8 +180,6 @@ rtc@68 {
>> &qspi {
>> status = "okay";
>> flash@0 {
>> - #address-cells = <1>;
>> - #size-cells = <1>;
>> compatible = "micron,mt25qu02g", "jedec,spi-nor";
>> reg = <0>;
>> spi-max-frequency = <100000000>;
>
> All patches applied!
This was two months ago, so it should reach v6.10-rc1. It is neither in
v6.10-rc1 nor in linux-next.
Are you sure you applied this?
Are your trees in linux-next?
Best regards,
Krzysztof
