Hi Andrew, On 31/05/24 6:07 pm, Andrew Lunn wrote: > EXTERNAL EMAIL: Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe > >> So I would request all of you to give your comments on the existing >> implementation in the patch series to improve better. Once this version >> is mainlined we will discuss further to implement further features >> supported. I feel the current discussion doesn't have any impact on the >> existing implementation which supports basic 10Base-T1S Ethernet >> communication. > > Agreed. Lets focus on what we have now. Great. Thanks for your opinion on this. > > https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/netdevbpf/patch/20240418125648.372526-2-Parthiban.Veerasooran@xxxxxxxxxxxxx/ > > Version 4 failed to apply. So we are missing all the CI tests. We need > a v5 which cleanly applies to net-next in order for those tests to > run. Sure I will start preparing the v5 now. > > I think we should disable vendor interrupts by default, since we > currently have no way to handle them. OK, I will remove the patch which enables the interrupts. > > I had a quick look at the comments on the patches. I don't think we > have any other big issues not agreed on. So please post a v5 with them > all addressed and we will see what the CI says. Sure, thanks for the confirmation. Best regards, Parthiban V > > Piergiorgio, if you have any real problems getting basic support for > your device working with this framework, now would be a good time to > raise the problems. > > Andrew
