On Tue, 28 May 2024 07:23:03 +0000 Arthur Becker <arthur.becker@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Thanks for the Review! > Right, I wasn't sure if and how to add the veml6040 to the veml6075 dt-binding file. > I'll modify that the next time I make adjustments to the driver. Hi Arthur, If I read the above correctly you are hoping this merges as it stands and we come back later. If we are going to combine them long term, I'd rather we avoided the churn and had a combined DT binding from the start. Jonathan > > Kind regards, > Arthur > > ________________________________________ > From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@xxxxxxxxxx> > Sent: 27 May 2024 18:31 > To: Arthur Becker; Jonathan Cameron; Lars-Peter Clausen; Rob Herring; Krzysztof Kozlowski; Conor Dooley > Cc: linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-iio@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; devicetree@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: [EXTERNAL]Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] dt-bindings: iio: light: add VEML6040 RGBW-LS bindings > > On 27/05/2024 17:12, Arthur Becker via B4 Relay wrote: > > From: Arthur Becker <arthur.becker@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > > Device tree bindings for the vishay VEML6040 RGBW light sensor iio > > driver > > > > Signed-off-by: Arthur Becker <arthur.becker@xxxxxxxxxx> > > --- > > V1 -> V3: Addressed review comments (v1 of the dt-bindings was sent > > along with v2 of the driver but not in a set) > > It's basically the same as veml6075, so should be put there... > > Eh, > > Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxx> > > Best regards, > Krzysztof >
