Re: [PATCH 00/16] dt-bindings: clock: qcom: reference qcom-gcc.yaml

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, 31 May 2024 at 18:19, Krzysztof Kozlowski
<krzysztof.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On 31/05/2024 17:14, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> > On Fri, May 31, 2024 at 03:52:18PM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> Unify Qualcomm clock controllers by referencing qcom,gcc.yaml where
> >> applicable.  Several existing bindings for these display/GPU/CAM clock
> >> controllers already do it.
> >
> > The series looks good to me with a single point in mind. You are writing
> > that dispcc/videocc/etc are a variant of GCC. However GCC is a Global
> > Clock Controller.
>
> Yeah, that's simplification from my side and assumption that at first
> they designed GCC and then they copied the design to other blocks.
>
> > What about renaming qcom,gcc.yaml to
> > qcom,cc-common.yaml ? Then the rest makes total sense to me.
>
> Several gpu/disp/cam clock controllers already include qcom,gcc.yaml, so
> I would say this should not be a requirement for this patchset.
>
> We can rename, although it always is a bit of churn - git log needs
> special option, backporting is a bit trickier.

Ok. For the series:

Reviewed-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@xxxxxxxxxx>


-- 
With best wishes
Dmitry




[Index of Archives]     [Device Tree Compilter]     [Device Tree Spec]     [Linux Driver Backports]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux PCI Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Yosemite Backpacking]


  Powered by Linux