On Fri, May 31, 2024 at 08:48:04AM -0400, Elinor Montmasson wrote: > Then maybe it's not be a good idea to make this compatible generic > for this contribution. > The original intention is to bring support for the S/PDIF, > so maybe the contribution should focus on this use case? > In that case, would changing the compatible for "fsl,imx-audio-spdif-card" > be acceptable? > "fsl,imx-audio-spdif" is already used for the `imx-spdif.c` > which does not use the ASRC. Why not just use the existing compatible - why would someone not want to be able to use the ASRC if it's available in their system?
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
