On 25/02/15 16:14, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
On Tuesday 24 February 2015 15:14:14 Sudeep Holla wrote:
Hi Arnd,
On 21/01/15 14:43, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
On Wednesday 21 January 2015 12:02:30 Sudeep Holla wrote:
Hi Arnd/Olof,
Though this patch and commit 5d425c18653731af6 ("arm64: kernel: add
support for cpu cache information") which is in -next(via arm64) are
dependent to provide desired functionality, then can go indepedently
if you think there could be conflicts if this change is taken via arm64.
If not, Catalin can pick up with your acks after the review.
I think it would be better to take this through arm-soc. It's not
extremely likely to cause conflicts, but as you say there are no
strict dependencies on which goes in first, so there is no harm
in merging them separately.
I think this patch got missed for -rc1. The arm64 architectural
support patch for cacheinfo got merged via arm64 tree. It would be good
if this is also merged so that cache information can be exposed
to the user-space on ARM Ltd boards.
Ah, bummer. I've applied this one as a fix for 4.0 because I said we'd
take it and dropped the ball on it.
Thanks Arnd.
Regards,
Sudeep
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
