Hi Arnd, On 21/01/15 14:43, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
On Wednesday 21 January 2015 12:02:30 Sudeep Holla wrote:Hi Arnd/Olof, Though this patch and commit 5d425c18653731af6 ("arm64: kernel: add support for cpu cache information") which is in -next(via arm64) are dependent to provide desired functionality, then can go indepedently if you think there could be conflicts if this change is taken via arm64. If not, Catalin can pick up with your acks after the review.I think it would be better to take this through arm-soc. It's not extremely likely to cause conflicts, but as you say there are no strict dependencies on which goes in first, so there is no harm in merging them separately.
I think this patch got missed for -rc1. The arm64 architectural support patch for cacheinfo got merged via arm64 tree. It would be good if this is also merged so that cache information can be exposed to the user-space on ARM Ltd boards. Regards, Sudeep -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
