Hi,
On 25/05/24 7:06 PM, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
On Thu, 23 May 2024 14:45:01 +0200
Nuno Sá <noname.nuno@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Wed, 2024-05-22 at 17:01 +0200, Angelo Dureghello wrote:
From: Angelo Dureghello <adureghello@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
After testing this driver, add some minor fixes and improvements,
as adding single channel variants support (ad3541r, ad3551r), also as a
preparatory step to bigger future improvements related to fast-rate mode
for this DAC family.
Previous patches (v1, 3/3)
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-iio/20240510141836.1624009-1-adureghello@xxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-iio/20240510141836.1624009-2-adureghello@xxxxxxxxxxxx/
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-iio/20240510141836.1624009-3-adureghello@xxxxxxxxxxxx/
Angelo Dureghello (6):
dt-bindings: iio: dac: fix ad3552r gain parameter names
dt-bindings: iio: dac: add ad35xxr single output variants
iio: dac: ad3552r: add model data structure
iio: dac: ad3552r: add support for ad3541r and ad3551r
iio: dac: ad3552r: change AD3552R_NUM_CH define name
iio: dac: ad3552r: uniform structure names
.../bindings/iio/dac/adi,ad3552r.yaml | 43 ++++--
drivers/iio/dac/ad3552r.c | 140 ++++++++++++------
2 files changed, 128 insertions(+), 55 deletions(-)
Reviewed-by: Nuno Sa <nuno.sa@xxxxxxxxxx>
This series crossed with a series using
device_for_each_child_node_scoped()
I've rebased on top of that. Was moderately straightforwards but
given last week I messed a similar change up completely please
check the testing branch of iio.git!
The mess was all it the patch adding model_data
Thanks for this, sure, will check.
Thanks,
Jonathan
Regards,
angelo
