On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 11:51:57AM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Wednesday 25 February 2015 17:07:22 Yingjoe Chen wrote: > > On Tue, 2015-01-27 at 15:13 +0800, Hongzhou Yang wrote: > > > From: Hongzhou Yang <hongzhou.yang@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > > > The upcoming MTK pinctrl driver have a big pin table for each SoC, > > > and we don't want to bloat the kernel binary if we don't need it. > > > Add config options so we can build for one SoC only. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Hongzhou Yang <hongzhou.yang@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > --- > > > arch/arm64/Kconfig | 6 ++++++ > > > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+) > > > > > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/Kconfig b/arch/arm64/Kconfig > > > index e627ead..6213dac 100644 > > > --- a/arch/arm64/Kconfig > > > +++ b/arch/arm64/Kconfig > > > @@ -151,9 +151,15 @@ menu "Platform selection" > > > config ARCH_MEDIATEK > > > bool "Mediatek MT65xx & MT81xx ARMv8 SoC" > > > select ARM_GIC > > > + select PINCTRL > > > help > > > Support for Mediatek MT65xx & MT81xx ARMv8 SoCs > > > > > > +config MACH_MT8173 > > > + bool "Mediatek 8173 Soc Supprt" > > > + depends on ARCH_MEDIATEK > > > + default y > > > + > > > config ARCH_SEATTLE > > > bool "AMD Seattle SoC Family" > > > help > > > > Hi Arnd/Matthias, > > > > Any comments on this patch? > > Hi Joe, > > Actually I just commented on a similar patch from Samsung the other > day, and I think we should make a more general decision about these: > > I would rather see only one Kconfig option per SoC family and use > ARCH_MEDIATEK without any MACH_* options. We can have other options > for e.g. networking chips from Mediatek that are not closely related > but I would group all the phone and tablet chips under one option > here. Same for the other vendors of course. I agree. -- Catalin -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
