On Wednesday 25 February 2015 17:07:22 Yingjoe Chen wrote: > On Tue, 2015-01-27 at 15:13 +0800, Hongzhou Yang wrote: > > From: Hongzhou Yang <hongzhou.yang@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > The upcoming MTK pinctrl driver have a big pin table for each SoC, > > and we don't want to bloat the kernel binary if we don't need it. > > Add config options so we can build for one SoC only. > > > > Signed-off-by: Hongzhou Yang <hongzhou.yang@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > > --- > > arch/arm64/Kconfig | 6 ++++++ > > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+) > > > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/Kconfig b/arch/arm64/Kconfig > > index e627ead..6213dac 100644 > > --- a/arch/arm64/Kconfig > > +++ b/arch/arm64/Kconfig > > @@ -151,9 +151,15 @@ menu "Platform selection" > > config ARCH_MEDIATEK > > bool "Mediatek MT65xx & MT81xx ARMv8 SoC" > > select ARM_GIC > > + select PINCTRL > > help > > Support for Mediatek MT65xx & MT81xx ARMv8 SoCs > > > > +config MACH_MT8173 > > + bool "Mediatek 8173 Soc Supprt" > > + depends on ARCH_MEDIATEK > > + default y > > + > > config ARCH_SEATTLE > > bool "AMD Seattle SoC Family" > > help > > Hi Arnd/Matthias, > > Any comments on this patch? Hi Joe, Actually I just commented on a similar patch from Samsung the other day, and I think we should make a more general decision about these: I would rather see only one Kconfig option per SoC family and use ARCH_MEDIATEK without any MACH_* options. We can have other options for e.g. networking chips from Mediatek that are not closely related but I would group all the phone and tablet chips under one option here. Same for the other vendors of course. Any other opinions? Arnd -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
