On Fri, May 24, 2024 at 04:30:32PM -0500, Judith Mendez wrote: > On 5/24/24 1:38 PM, Conor Dooley wrote: > > On Thu, May 23, 2024 at 06:15:10PM -0500, Judith Mendez wrote: > > > Add new compatible ti,am62-eqep for TI K3 devices. If a device > > > uses this compatible, require power-domains property. > > > > > > Since there is only one functional and interface clock for eqep, > > > clock-names is not really required. The clock-name also changed > > > for TI K3 SoCs so make clock-names optional for the new compatible > > > since there is only one clock that is routed to the IP. > > > > Really the clock should be named after the function it has in the IP > > block - it looks like "sysoutclk" is more likely the name of the clock > > routed to the IP rather than the role it has? > > It is the name of the clock, though id like to keep sysclkout for > backwards compatibility, even though the name is confusing. FWIW, I was not suggesting that it be renamed. Thanks, Conor.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
