Hi Rob, Kind reminder about the question in the mail thread below. Your response would be greatly appreciated. Thanks, Tomer On Thu, 16 May 2024 at 12:44, Tomer Maimon <tmaimon77@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Hi Rob, > > Thanks for your comment. > > On Mon, 13 May 2024 at 18:53, Rob Herring <robh@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > On Thu, May 09, 2024 at 10:24:11PM +0300, Tomer Maimon wrote: > > > Remove nuvoton,npcm845-clk binding since the NPCM8xx clock driver > > > using the auxiliary device framework and not the device tree framework. > > > > Again, this is an ABI break. Changing driver architecture for 1 OS is > > not a reason to change DT. > Is it an ABI break even if the NPCM8xx clock driver hasn't upstream > the kernel vanilla yet? > > I thought that since the NPCM8xx clock driver hasn't upstream the > kernel vanilla yet and and in the latest NPCM8xx clock driver patch > the NPCM8xx clock driver. > using auxiliary device framework instead of DT we should remove the > nuvoton,npcm845-clk.yaml file. > https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-clk/patch/20240509192411.2432066-4-tmaimon77@xxxxxxxxx/ > > > > > Rob > > Thanks, > > Tomer
