Hi Conor, Thanks for the clarification. On Mon, May 20, 2024 at 10:34 PM Conor Dooley <conor@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Mon, May 20, 2024 at 03:09:44PM +0530, Kanak Shilledar wrote: > > On Mon, May 20, 2024 at 1:02 AM Rob Herring (Arm) <robh@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > By "this patch" it means that having the information in the cover > doesn't help, but info about missing deps should go under the --- line > etc. I am still unable to get this part. I don't see there is any dependency other than the two patches dependent on each other. In my cover letter I have mentioned that the two patches are dependent on each other. > | base-commit: 20cb38a7af88dc40095da7c2c9094da3873fea23 > | prerequisite-patch-id: 158157d32a32e765834a0cb4fc6335f9009d9962 > | prerequisite-patch-id: 4007c7386e66f93b67a2631dddca08cadcee708b > > That said, why do you have two prerequisite patches? This applies on top > of 6.9-rc3 without any issues (other than trailing whitespace warnings). For generation the patches I am using the command: `git format-patch -2 -o outgoing/ --cover-letter --base=auto` It is automatically adding those two preqrequisite-patch-ids automatically along with the base-commit id. Is it due to the fact that I am having 2 older patches which I have rolled out already? Shall I remove those prerequisite patch id from the coverletter to solve this issue? > Also, you forgot the v3 tag on this patchset, which confuses tooling: I will fix it in my next version. I haven't changed anything in the patch so I will add the v3 tag and send it. > shazam https://lore.kernel.org/linux-riscv/20240519175906.138410-1-kanakshilledar111@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx/T/#t > Grabbing thread from lore.kernel.org/all/20240519175906.138410-1-kanakshilledar111@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx/t.mbox.gz > Checking for newer revisions > Grabbing search results from lore.kernel.org > ---> Added from v2: 1 patches > Analyzing 10 messages in the thread > ---> Will use the latest revision: v2 > You can pick other revisions using the -vN flag > Checking attestation on all messages, may take a moment... > Retrieving CI status, may take a moment... > Some CI checks failed, see patchwork for more info: > https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-riscv/list/?series=854147 > --- > ✓ [● PATCH v2] dt-bindings: interrupt-controller: riscv,cpu-intc: convert to dtschema > + Signed-off-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > --- > ✓ Signed: DKIM/gmail.com > --- > Total patches: 1 > --- > Applying: dt-bindings: interrupt-controller: riscv,cpu-intc: convert to dtschema > > Thanks, > Conor. Thanks and Regards, Kanak Shilledar
