Il 20/05/24 12:03, Krzysztof Kozlowski ha scritto:
On 20/05/2024 11:58, AngeloGioacchino Del Regno wrote:
Il 18/05/24 23:11, Krzysztof Kozlowski ha scritto:
The top SCPSYS node is not a power domain provider. It's child
"power-controller" is instead. Fix dtbs_check warnings like:
mt8365-evk.dtb: syscon@10006000: '#power-domain-cells' does not match any of the regexes: 'pinctrl-[0-9]+'
Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxx>
Well if you're fixing that by migrating to scpsys compatible, you might as well
resolve all of the warnings in one commit, removing that power-domain-cells
property in patch [2/4], otherwise this one is technically a fix for that.
Please squash [2/4] and [3/4], like that it just makes more sense.
That's independent thing. Previous compatible - syscfg - also did not
allow power domains. The difference is that bindings did not print a
warning without my change. We can reverse the patches if this is more
suitable.
You're still introducing a warning with patch 2.
As for swapping the order, that could also be a solution, but I still don't see
that as an independent thing - in any case, swapping them is something I can do
while applying, eventually.
