On 20/05/2024 11:55, AngeloGioacchino Del Regno wrote: > Il 18/05/24 23:11, Krzysztof Kozlowski ha scritto: >> SoCs should use dedicated compatibles for each of their syscon nodes to >> precisely describe the block. Using an incorrect compatible does not >> allow to properly match/validate children of the syscon device. Replace >> SYSCFG compatible, which does not have children, with a new dedicated >> one for SCPSYS block. >> >> Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxx> > > Technically, that's not a SCPSYS block, but called SYSCFG in MT8365, but the > meaning and the functioning is the same, so it's fine for me. So there are two syscfg blocks? With exactly the same set of registers or different? Best regards, Krzysztof
