Hi Conor
On 5/17/2024 8:11 PM, Conor Dooley wrote:
On Fri, May 17, 2024 at 03:39:20PM +0100, Conor Dooley wrote:
On Fri, May 17, 2024 at 04:12:26PM +0530, Udit Kumar wrote:
Modify license to include dual licensing as GPL-2.0-only OR MIT
license for TI specific phy header files. This allows for Linux
kernel files to be used in other Operating System ecosystems
such as Zephyr or FreeBSD.
What's wrong with BSD-2-Clause, why not use that?
I cut myself off, I meant to say:
What's wrong with BSD-2-Clause, the standard dual license for
bindings, why not use that?
want to be inline with License of top level DTS, which is including this
header file
eg
https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/latest/source/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-j722s-evm.dts#L1
