On Fri, May 17, 2024 at 03:39:20PM +0100, Conor Dooley wrote: > On Fri, May 17, 2024 at 04:12:26PM +0530, Udit Kumar wrote: > > Modify license to include dual licensing as GPL-2.0-only OR MIT > > license for TI specific phy header files. This allows for Linux > > kernel files to be used in other Operating System ecosystems > > such as Zephyr or FreeBSD. > > What's wrong with BSD-2-Clause, why not use that? I cut myself off, I meant to say: What's wrong with BSD-2-Clause, the standard dual license for bindings, why not use that?
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
