On Tue 14 May 2024 at 00:47, Dmitry Rokosov <ddrokosov@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> I agree that currently that carefully reading the code clears that up >> but it is misleading >> >> CLK_MESON_PLL_EN_NOINIT ? >> > > I have been considering this name and its derivatives, such as: > > CLK_MESON_PLL_SKIP_ENABLED > CLK_MESON_PLL_NOINIT_ENABLED That one accurately describes what you do. Use this one please
