On Fri, May 10, 2024 at 9:19 AM Angelo Dureghello
<adureghello@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> From: Angelo Dureghello <adureghello@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Add support for single-output dac variants.
>
> Signed-off-by: Angelo Dureghello <adureghello@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/iio/dac/ad3552r.c | 39 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------
> 1 file changed, 29 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/iio/dac/ad3552r.c b/drivers/iio/dac/ad3552r.c
> index a492e8f2fc0f..0dd6f995c3e2 100644
> --- a/drivers/iio/dac/ad3552r.c
> +++ b/drivers/iio/dac/ad3552r.c
> @@ -140,7 +140,9 @@ enum ad3552r_ch_vref_select {
> };
>
> enum ad3542r_id {
> + AD3541R_ID = 0x400b,
> AD3542R_ID = 0x4009,
> + AD3551R_ID = 0x400a,
> AD3552R_ID = 0x4008,
> };
>
> @@ -745,7 +747,8 @@ static void ad3552r_calc_gain_and_offset(struct ad3552r_desc *dac, s32 ch)
> } else {
> /* Normal range */
> idx = dac->ch_data[ch].range;
> - if (dac->chip_id == AD3542R_ID) {
> + if (dac->chip_id == AD3541R_ID ||
> + dac->chip_id == AD3542R_ID) {
> v_min = ad3542r_ch_ranges[idx][0];
> v_max = ad3542r_ch_ranges[idx][1];
> } else {
> @@ -780,7 +783,7 @@ static int ad3552r_find_range(u16 id, s32 *vals)
> int i, len;
> const s32 (*ranges)[2];
>
> - if (id == AD3542R_ID) {
> + if (id == AD3541R_ID || id == AD3542R_ID) {
> len = ARRAY_SIZE(ad3542r_ch_ranges);
> ranges = ad3542r_ch_ranges;
> } else {
> @@ -955,9 +958,10 @@ static int ad3552r_configure_device(struct ad3552r_desc *dac)
> dev_err(dev, "mandatory reg property missing\n");
> goto put_child;
> }
> - if (ch >= AD3552R_NUM_CH) {
> - dev_err(dev, "reg must be less than %d\n",
> - AD3552R_NUM_CH);
> + if (ch >= AD3552R_NUM_CH ||
> + (dac->chip_id == AD3541R_ID && ch) ||
> + (dac->chip_id == AD3551R_ID && ch)) {
> + dev_err(dev, "channel %d is not supported\n", ch);
> err = -EINVAL;
> goto put_child;
> }
> @@ -987,9 +991,10 @@ static int ad3552r_configure_device(struct ad3552r_desc *dac)
> goto put_child;
>
> dac->ch_data[ch].range = val;
> - } else if (dac->chip_id == AD3542R_ID) {
> + } else if (dac->chip_id == AD3541R_ID ||
> + dac->chip_id == AD3542R_ID) {
> dev_err(dev,
> - "adi,output-range-microvolt is required for ad3542r\n");
> + "adi,output-range-microvolt is required for ad354xr\n");
> err = -EINVAL;
> goto put_child;
> } else {
> @@ -1088,10 +1093,20 @@ static int ad3552r_probe(struct spi_device *spi)
> return err;
>
> /* Config triggered buffer device */
> - if (dac->chip_id == AD3552R_ID)
> - indio_dev->name = "ad3552r";
> - else
> + switch (dac->chip_id) {
> + case AD3541R_ID:
> + indio_dev->name = "ad3541r";
> + break;
> + case AD3542R_ID:
> indio_dev->name = "ad3542r";
> + break;
> + case AD3551R_ID:
> + indio_dev->name = "ad3551r";
> + break;
> + case AD3552R_ID:
> + indio_dev->name = "ad3552r";
> + break;
> + }
> indio_dev->dev.parent = &spi->dev;
> indio_dev->info = &ad3552r_iio_info;
> indio_dev->num_channels = dac->num_ch;
> @@ -1110,14 +1125,18 @@ static int ad3552r_probe(struct spi_device *spi)
> }
>
> static const struct spi_device_id ad3552r_id[] = {
> + { "ad3541r", AD3541R_ID },
> { "ad3542r", AD3542R_ID },
> + { "ad3551r", AD3551R_ID },
> { "ad3552r", AD3552R_ID },
> { }
> };
> MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(spi, ad3552r_id);
>
> static const struct of_device_id ad3552r_of_match[] = {
> + { .compatible = "adi,ad3541r"},
> { .compatible = "adi,ad3542r"},
> + { .compatible = "adi,ad3551r"},
> { .compatible = "adi,ad3552r"},
> { }
> };
> --
> 2.45.0.rc1
>
>
It looks like it is time for a chip_info struct here instead of the if
and switch statements to get chip-specific data. Most other IIO
drivers have this already and it is the preferred way to look up this
kind of information in the IIO subsystem. I prefer the drivers that
don't put all of the info structs in an array (that way the code is
less verbose). So I would suggest looking at e.g. adc/aspeed_adc,
starting with aspeed_adc_matches, to see what I mean and how to
implement it. (So one patch to add the info structs and a second patch
to add the single channel chips)
