Am 09.05.24 um 18:00 schrieb Conor Dooley: > On Thu, May 09, 2024 at 10:49:13AM +0000, Josua Mayer wrote: >> Am 09.05.24 um 12:46 schrieb Josua Mayer: >>> Add bindings for the SolidRun CN9132 COM-Express Type 7 evaluation board. >>> The CEX is based on CN9130 SoC and includes two southbridges. >>> >>> Because CN9132 and 9131 are just names for different designs around the >>> same SoC, no soc compatibles beside marvell,cn9130 are needed. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Josua Mayer <josua@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> >>> Acked-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxx> >>> Reviewed-by: Andrew Lunn <andrew@xxxxxxx> >>> --- >>> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/marvell/armada-7k-8k.yaml | 8 ++++++++ >>> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+) >>> >>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/marvell/armada-7k-8k.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/marvell/armada-7k-8k.yaml >>> index 74d935ea279c..538d91be8857 100644 >>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/marvell/armada-7k-8k.yaml >>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/marvell/armada-7k-8k.yaml >>> @@ -92,4 +92,12 @@ properties: >>> - const: solidrun,cn9130-sr-som >>> - const: marvell,cn9130 >>> >>> + - description: >>> + SolidRun CN9132 COM-Express Type 7 based single-board computers >>> + items: >>> + - enum: >>> + - solidrun,cn9132-clearfog >>> + - const: solidrun,cn9132-sr-cex7 >>> + - const: marvell,cn9130 >>> + >>> additionalProperties: true >>> >> It appears I will not be able to submit actual device-tree for this >> board. Therefore when applying this patch-set, it may be skipped. >> >> I am not sure about the policy in this case, >> if it is better to pick or skip. > What do you mean my "not be able to"? Does the device exist? If it does > then, I at least, have no objection to documenting a compatible for it. Yes, it exists, and we do have a (low quality) dts for it. I may not be able to do it in time for closing of merge window. If it can go with actual dts, that's great!
