On Thu, May 09, 2024 at 10:49:13AM +0000, Josua Mayer wrote: > Am 09.05.24 um 12:46 schrieb Josua Mayer: > > Add bindings for the SolidRun CN9132 COM-Express Type 7 evaluation board. > > The CEX is based on CN9130 SoC and includes two southbridges. > > > > Because CN9132 and 9131 are just names for different designs around the > > same SoC, no soc compatibles beside marvell,cn9130 are needed. > > > > Signed-off-by: Josua Mayer <josua@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Acked-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxx> > > Reviewed-by: Andrew Lunn <andrew@xxxxxxx> > > --- > > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/marvell/armada-7k-8k.yaml | 8 ++++++++ > > 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+) > > > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/marvell/armada-7k-8k.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/marvell/armada-7k-8k.yaml > > index 74d935ea279c..538d91be8857 100644 > > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/marvell/armada-7k-8k.yaml > > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/marvell/armada-7k-8k.yaml > > @@ -92,4 +92,12 @@ properties: > > - const: solidrun,cn9130-sr-som > > - const: marvell,cn9130 > > > > + - description: > > + SolidRun CN9132 COM-Express Type 7 based single-board computers > > + items: > > + - enum: > > + - solidrun,cn9132-clearfog > > + - const: solidrun,cn9132-sr-cex7 > > + - const: marvell,cn9130 > > + > > additionalProperties: true > > > It appears I will not be able to submit actual device-tree for this > board. Therefore when applying this patch-set, it may be skipped. > > I am not sure about the policy in this case, > if it is better to pick or skip. What do you mean my "not be able to"? Does the device exist? If it does then, I at least, have no objection to documenting a compatible for it. Cheers, Conor.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
