On 5/8/24 03:30, Sagar Cheluvegowda wrote:
To: Bjorn Andersson <andersson@xxxxxxxxxx> To: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@xxxxxxxxxx> To: Rob Herring <robh@xxxxxxxxxx> To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@xxxxxxxxxx> To: Conor Dooley <conor+dt@xxxxxxxxxx> To: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@xxxxxxxxxx> To: Andrew Halaney <ahalaney@xxxxxxxxxx> To: Vinod Koul <vkoul@xxxxxxxxxx> To: David S. Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> To: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@xxxxxxxxxx> To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@xxxxxxxxxx> To: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@xxxxxxxxxx> To: Bhupesh Sharma <bhupesh.sharma@xxxxxxxxxx> Cc: kernel@xxxxxxxxxxx Cc: linux-arm-msm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Cc: devicetree@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Cc: linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Cc: netdev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Patch 1 :- This patch marks Ethernet devices on Sa8775p as DMA-coherent as both the devices are cache coherent. Patch 2 :- Update the schema of qcom,ethqos to allow specifying Ethernet devices as "dma-coherent".
Per-patch descriptions like this are usually redundant, unless you're reworking something complex and non-obvious. These things above, we can infer from the commit titles alone. Generally, when there's not much to say in the cover letter, you can just give a very brief summary like "This series fixes X on Y". Not a huge deal though. Konrad
