> Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/3] arm64: dts: freescale: add i.MX95 basic dtsi > > Hi Peng, > > thanks for your patch. > > Am Sonntag, 28. April 2024, 14:22:20 CEST schrieb Peng Fan (OSS): > > From: Peng Fan <peng.fan@xxxxxxx> > > > > i.MX95 features 6 A55 Cores, ARM Mali GPU, ISP, ML acceleration NPU, > > and Edgelock secure enclave security. This patch is to add a minimal > > dtsi, with cpu cores, coresight, scmi, gic, uart, mu, sdhc, lpi2c added. > > > > Signed-off-by: Peng Fan <peng.fan@xxxxxxx> > > --- > > arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx95-clock.h | 187 +++++ > > arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx95-power.h | 55 ++ > > arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx95.dtsi | 1152 > +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > 3 files changed, 1394 insertions(+) > > > > [snip] > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx95.dtsi > > b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx95.dtsi > > new file mode 100644 > > index 000000000000..f52023ec7f0c > > --- /dev/null > > +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx95.dtsi > > [snip] > > + soc { > > + compatible = "simple-bus"; > > + #address-cells = <2>; > > + #size-cells = <2>; > > + ranges; > > + > > + aips2: bus@42000000 { > > + compatible = "fsl,aips-bus", "simple-bus"; > > + reg = <0x0 0x42000000 0x0 0x800000>; > > + ranges = <0x42000000 0x0 0x42000000 > 0x8000000>, > > + <0x28000000 0x0 0x28000000 > 0x10000000>; > > + #address-cells = <1>; > > + #size-cells = <1>; > > + > > + mu7: mailbox@42430000 { > > + compatible = "fsl,imx95-mu"; > > + reg = <0x42430000 0x10000>; > > + interrupts = <GIC_SPI 234 > IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>; > > + clocks = <&scmi_clk > IMX95_CLK_BUSWAKEUP>; > > + #mbox-cells = <2>; > > + status = "disabled"; > > + }; > > + > > + mu8: mailbox@42730000 { > > Please sort all nodes by address. Sure. fix in v4. > > > + compatible = "fsl,imx95-mu"; > > + reg = <0x42730000 0x10000>; > > + interrupts = <GIC_SPI 235 > IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>; > > + clocks = <&scmi_clk > IMX95_CLK_BUSWAKEUP>; > > + #mbox-cells = <2>; > > + status = "disabled"; > > + }; > > + > > + wdog3: watchdog@42490000 { > > + compatible = "fsl,imx93-wdt"; > > + reg = <0x42490000 0x10000>; > > + interrupts = <GIC_SPI 77 > IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>; > > + clocks = <&scmi_clk > IMX95_CLK_BUSWAKEUP>; > > + timeout-sec = <40>; > > + fsl,ext-reset-output; > > Isn't this board specific? Yeah. Board specific, remove it. > > > + status = "disabled"; > > + }; > > + > > + tpm3: pwm@424e0000 { > > + compatible = "fsl,imx7ulp-pwm"; > > + reg = <0x424e0000 0x1000>; > > + clocks = <&scmi_clk > IMX95_CLK_BUSWAKEUP>; > > + #pwm-cells = <3>; > > + status = "disabled"; > > + }; > > [snip] > > + }; > > + > > + aips3: bus@42800000 { > > + compatible = "fsl,aips-bus", "simple-bus"; > > + reg = <0 0x42800000 0 0x800000>; > > + #address-cells = <1>; > > + #size-cells = <1>; > > + ranges = <0x42800000 0x0 0x42800000 0x800000>; > > + > > + usdhc1: mmc@42850000 { > > + compatible = "fsl,imx95-usdhc", > "fsl,imx8mm-usdhc"; > > + reg = <0x42850000 0x10000>; > > + interrupts = <GIC_SPI 86 > IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>; > > + clocks = <&scmi_clk > IMX95_CLK_BUSWAKEUP>, > > + <&scmi_clk > IMX95_CLK_WAKEUPAXI>, > > + <&scmi_clk IMX95_CLK_USDHC1>; > > + clock-names = "ipg", "ahb", "per"; > > + assigned-clocks = <&scmi_clk > IMX95_CLK_USDHC1>; > > + assigned-clock-parents = <&scmi_clk > IMX95_CLK_SYSPLL1_PFD1>; > > + assigned-clock-rates = <400000000>; > > + bus-width = <8>; > > + fsl,tuning-start-tap = <1>; > > + fsl,tuning-step= <2>; > > Isn't this board specific? Or is there a hardware limitation? Yeah, just follow what imx93 has, board could override them. No hardware limitation as I know. > > > + status = "disabled"; > > + }; > > + > > + usdhc2: mmc@42860000 { > > + compatible = "fsl,imx95-usdhc", > "fsl,imx8mm-usdhc"; > > + reg = <0x42860000 0x10000>; > > + interrupts = <GIC_SPI 87 > IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>; > > + clocks = <&scmi_clk > IMX95_CLK_BUSWAKEUP>, > > + <&scmi_clk > IMX95_CLK_WAKEUPAXI>, > > + <&scmi_clk IMX95_CLK_USDHC2>; > > + clock-names = "ipg", "ahb", "per"; > > + assigned-clocks = <&scmi_clk > IMX95_CLK_USDHC2>; > > + assigned-clock-parents = <&scmi_clk > IMX95_CLK_SYSPLL1_PFD1>; > > + assigned-clock-rates = <200000000>; > > Why is usdhc2 only 200 MHz but usdhc1 400 MHz? No specific reason, 400M should also work. > > > + bus-width = <4>; > > + fsl,tuning-start-tap = <1>; > > + fsl,tuning-step= <2>; > > Isn't this board specific? Or is there a hardware limitation? Yes, just follow what i.MX93 has and board could override them. > > > + status = "disabled"; > > + }; > > + > > + usdhc3: mmc@428b0000 { > > + compatible = "fsl,imx95-usdhc", > "fsl,imx8mm-usdhc"; > > + reg = <0x428b0000 0x10000>; > > + interrupts = <GIC_SPI 191 > IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>; > > + clocks = <&scmi_clk > IMX95_CLK_BUSWAKEUP>, > > + <&scmi_clk > IMX95_CLK_WAKEUPAXI>, > > + <&scmi_clk IMX95_CLK_USDHC3>; > > + clock-names = "ipg", "ahb", "per"; > > No need to configure IMX95_CLK_USDHC3? I will add it. > > > + bus-width = <4>; > > + fsl,tuning-start-tap = <1>; > > + fsl,tuning-step= <2>; > > + status = "disabled"; > > + }; > > + }; > > + > > + gpio2: gpio@43810000 { > > + compatible = "fsl,imx95-gpio", "fsl,imx8ulp-gpio"; > > + reg = <0x0 0x43810000 0x0 0x1000>; > > + gpio-controller; > > + #gpio-cells = <2>; > > + interrupts = <GIC_SPI 49 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>, > > + <GIC_SPI 50 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>; > > + interrupt-controller; > > + #interrupt-cells = <2>; > > + clocks = <&scmi_clk IMX95_CLK_BUSWAKEUP>, > > + <&scmi_clk IMX95_CLK_BUSWAKEUP>; > > + clock-names = "gpio", "port"; > > + }; > > + > > + gpio3: gpio@43820000 { > > + compatible = "fsl,imx95-gpio", "fsl,imx8ulp-gpio"; > > + reg = <0x0 0x43820000 0x0 0x1000>; > > + gpio-controller; > > + #gpio-cells = <2>; > > + interrupts = <GIC_SPI 51 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>, > > + <GIC_SPI 52 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>; > > + interrupt-controller; > > + #interrupt-cells = <2>; > > + clocks = <&scmi_clk IMX95_CLK_BUSWAKEUP>, > > + <&scmi_clk IMX95_CLK_BUSWAKEUP>; > > + clock-names = "gpio", "port"; > > + }; > > + > > + gpio4: gpio@43840000 { > > + compatible = "fsl,imx95-gpio", "fsl,imx8ulp-gpio"; > > + reg = <0x0 0x43840000 0x0 0x1000>; > > + gpio-controller; > > + #gpio-cells = <2>; > > + interrupts = <GIC_SPI 53 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>, > > + <GIC_SPI 54 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>; > > + interrupt-controller; > > + #interrupt-cells = <2>; > > + clocks = <&scmi_clk IMX95_CLK_BUSWAKEUP>, > > + <&scmi_clk IMX95_CLK_BUSWAKEUP>; > > + clock-names = "gpio", "port"; > > + }; > > + > > + gpio5: gpio@43850000 { > > + compatible = "fsl,imx95-gpio", "fsl,imx8ulp-gpio"; > > + reg = <0x0 0x43850000 0x0 0x1000>; > > + gpio-controller; > > + #gpio-cells = <2>; > > + interrupts = <GIC_SPI 55 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>, > > + <GIC_SPI 56 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>; > > + interrupt-controller; > > + #interrupt-cells = <2>; > > + clocks = <&scmi_clk IMX95_CLK_BUSWAKEUP>, > > + <&scmi_clk IMX95_CLK_BUSWAKEUP>; > > + clock-names = "gpio", "port"; > > + }; > > + > > + aips1: bus@44000000 { > > + compatible = "fsl,aips-bus", "simple-bus"; > > + reg = <0x0 0x44000000 0x0 0x800000>; > > + ranges = <0x44000000 0x0 0x44000000 0x800000>; > > + #address-cells = <1>; > > + #size-cells = <1>; > > + > > + mu1: mailbox@44220000 { > > + compatible = "fsl,imx95-mu"; > > + reg = <0x44220000 0x10000>; > > + interrupts = <GIC_SPI 224 > IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>; > > + clocks = <&scmi_clk IMX95_CLK_BUSAON>; > > + #mbox-cells = <2>; > > + status = "disabled"; > > + }; > > + > > + mu2: mailbox@445b0000 { > > + compatible = "fsl,imx95-mu"; > > + reg = <0x445b0000 0x1000>; > > + ranges; > > + interrupts = <GIC_SPI 226 > IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>; > > + #address-cells = <1>; > > + #size-cells = <1>; > > + #mbox-cells = <2>; > > + > > + sram0: sram@445b1000 { > > + compatible = "mmio-sram"; > > + reg = <0x445b1000 0x400>; > > + ranges = <0x0 0x445b1000 0x400>; > > + #address-cells = <1>; > > + #size-cells = <1>; > > + > > + scmi_buf0: scmi-sram-section@0 { > > + compatible = "arm,scmi- > shmem"; > > + reg = <0x0 0x80>; > > + }; > > + > > + scmi_buf1: scmi-sram-section@80 > { > > + compatible = "arm,scmi- > shmem"; > > + reg = <0x80 0x80>; > > + }; > > + }; > > I guess this MU depends on the system manager firmware, no? Yes, depends on firmware. > > > + }; > > + > > + mu3: mailbox@445d0000 { > > + compatible = "fsl,imx95-mu"; > > + reg = <0x445d0000 0x10000>; > > + interrupts = <GIC_SPI 228 > IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>; > > + clocks = <&scmi_clk IMX95_CLK_BUSAON>; > > + #mbox-cells = <2>; > > + status = "disabled"; > > + }; > > + > > + mu4: mailbox@445f0000 { > > + compatible = "fsl,imx95-mu"; > > + reg = <0x445f0000 0x10000>; > > + interrupts = <GIC_SPI 230 > IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>; > > + clocks = <&scmi_clk IMX95_CLK_BUSAON>; > > + #mbox-cells = <2>; > > + status = "disabled"; > > + }; > > + > > + mu6: mailbox@44630000 { > > + compatible = "fsl,imx95-mu"; > > + reg = <0x44630000 0x10000>; > > + interrupts = <GIC_SPI 206 > IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>; > > + clocks = <&scmi_clk IMX95_CLK_BUSAON>; > > + #mbox-cells = <2>; > > + status = "disabled"; > > + }; > > + > > + tpm1: pwm@44310000 { > > + compatible = "fsl,imx7ulp-pwm"; > > + reg = <0x44310000 0x1000>; > > + clocks = <&scmi_clk IMX95_CLK_BUSAON>; > > + #pwm-cells = <3>; > > + status = "disabled"; > > + }; > > + > > + tpm2: pwm@44320000 { > > + compatible = "fsl,imx7ulp-pwm"; > > + reg = <0x44320000 0x1000>; > > + clocks = <&scmi_clk IMX95_CLK_TPM2>; > > + #pwm-cells = <3>; > > + status = "disabled"; > > + }; > > + > > + lpi2c1: i2c@44340000 { > > + compatible = "fsl,imx95-lpi2c", "fsl,imx7ulp- > lpi2c"; > > + reg = <0x44340000 0x10000>; > > + interrupts = <GIC_SPI 13 > IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>; > > + clocks = <&scmi_clk IMX95_CLK_LPI2C1>, > > + <&scmi_clk IMX95_CLK_BUSAON>; > > + clock-names = "per", "ipg"; > > + status = "disabled"; > > + }; > > + > > + lpi2c2: i2c@44350000 { > > + compatible = "fsl,imx95-lpi2c", "fsl,imx7ulp- > lpi2c"; > > + reg = <0x44350000 0x10000>; > > + interrupts = <GIC_SPI 14 > IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>; > > + clocks = <&scmi_clk IMX95_CLK_LPI2C2>, > > + <&scmi_clk IMX95_CLK_BUSAON>; > > + clock-names = "per", "ipg"; > > + status = "disabled"; > > + }; > > + > > + lpspi1: spi@44360000 { > > + #address-cells = <1>; > > + #size-cells = <0>; > > + compatible = "fsl,imx95-spi", "fsl,imx7ulp- > spi"; > > + reg = <0x44360000 0x10000>; > > + interrupts = <GIC_SPI 16 > IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>; > > + clocks = <&scmi_clk IMX95_CLK_LPSPI1>, > > + <&scmi_clk IMX95_CLK_BUSAON>; > > + clock-names = "per", "ipg"; > > + status = "disabled"; > > + }; > > + > > + lpspi2: spi@44370000 { > > + #address-cells = <1>; > > + #size-cells = <0>; > > + compatible = "fsl,imx95-spi", "fsl,imx7ulp- > spi"; > > + reg = <0x44370000 0x10000>; > > + interrupts = <GIC_SPI 17 > IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>; > > + clocks = <&scmi_clk IMX95_CLK_LPSPI2>, > > + <&scmi_clk IMX95_CLK_BUSAON>; > > + clock-names = "per", "ipg"; > > + status = "disabled"; > > + }; > > + > > + lpuart1: serial@44380000 { > > + compatible = "fsl,imx95-lpuart", > "fsl,imx8ulp-lpuart", > > + "fsl,imx7ulp-lpuart"; > > + reg = <0x44380000 0x1000>; > > + interrupts = <GIC_SPI 19 > IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>; > > + clocks = <&scmi_clk IMX95_CLK_LPUART1>; > > + clock-names = "ipg"; > > + status = "disabled"; > > + }; > > + > > + lpuart2: serial@44390000 { > > + compatible = "fsl,imx95-lpuart", > "fsl,imx8ulp-lpuart", > > + "fsl,imx7ulp-lpuart"; > > + reg = <0x44390000 0x1000>; > > + interrupts = <GIC_SPI 20 > IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>; > > + clocks = <&scmi_clk IMX95_CLK_LPUART2>; > > + clock-names = "ipg"; > > + status = "disabled"; > > + }; > > + > > + adc1: adc@44530000 { > > + compatible = "nxp,imx93-adc"; > > + reg = <0x44530000 0x10000>; > > + interrupts = <GIC_SPI 199 > IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>, > > + <GIC_SPI 200 > IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>, > > + <GIC_SPI 201 > IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>; > > + clocks = <&scmi_clk IMX95_CLK_ADC>; > > + clock-names = "ipg"; > > + status = "disabled"; > > + }; > > Please sort the nodes by address. Sure. > > > + }; > > + > > + aips4: bus@49000000 { > > + compatible = "fsl,aips-bus", "simple-bus"; > > + reg = <0x0 0x49000000 0x0 0x800000>; > > + ranges = <0x49000000 0x0 0x49000000 0x800000>; > > + #address-cells = <1>; > > + #size-cells = <1>; > > + > > + smmu: iommu@490d0000 { > > + compatible = "arm,smmu-v3"; > > + reg = <0x490d0000 0x100000>; > > + interrupts = <GIC_SPI 325 > IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>, > > + <GIC_SPI 328 > IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>, > > + <GIC_SPI 334 > IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>, > > + <GIC_SPI 326 > IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>; > > + interrupt-names = "eventq", "gerror", "priq", > "cmdq-sync"; > > + #iommu-cells = <1>; > > + status = "disabled"; > > + }; > > + }; > > + > > + gpio1: gpio@47400000 { > > + compatible = "fsl,imx95-gpio", "fsl,imx8ulp-gpio"; > > + reg = <0x0 0x47400000 0x0 0x1000>; > > + gpio-controller; > > + #gpio-cells = <2>; > > + interrupts = <GIC_SPI 10 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>, > > + <GIC_SPI 11 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>; > > + interrupt-controller; > > + #interrupt-cells = <2>; > > + clocks = <&scmi_clk IMX95_CLK_M33>, > > + <&scmi_clk IMX95_CLK_M33>; > > + clock-names = "gpio", "port"; > > + status = "disabled"; > > I'm wondering of there should be a comment here that gpio1 usually is under > exclusive control of SM. Ok, will add comment. > > > + }; > > + > > + elemu0: mailbox@47520000 { > > + compatible = "fsl,imx95-mu-ele"; > > + reg = <0x0 0x47520000 0x0 0x10000>; > > + interrupts = <GIC_SPI 21 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>; > > + #mbox-cells = <2>; > > + status = "disabled"; > > + }; > > + > > + elemu1: mailbox@47530000 { > > + compatible = "fsl,imx95-mu-ele"; > > + reg = <0x0 0x47530000 0x0 0x10000>; > > + interrupts = <GIC_SPI 22 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>; > > + #mbox-cells = <2>; > > + status = "disabled"; > > + }; > > + > > + elemu2: mailbox@47540000 { > > + compatible = "fsl,imx95-mu-ele"; > > + reg = <0x0 0x47540000 0x0 0x10000>; > > + interrupts = <GIC_SPI 23 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>; > > + #mbox-cells = <2>; > > + status = "disabled"; > > + }; > > + > > + elemu3: mailbox@47550000 { > > + compatible = "fsl,imx95-mu-ele"; > > + reg = <0x0 0x47550000 0x0 0x10000>; > > + interrupts = <GIC_SPI 24 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>; > > + #mbox-cells = <2>; > > + }; > > + > > + elemu4: mailbox@47560000 { > > + compatible = "fsl,imx95-mu-ele"; > > + reg = <0x0 0x47560000 0x0 0x10000>; > > + interrupts = <GIC_SPI 25 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>; > > + #mbox-cells = <2>; > > + status = "disabled"; > > + }; > > + > > + elemu5: mailbox@47570000 { > > + compatible = "fsl,imx95-mu-ele"; > > + reg = <0x0 0x47570000 0x0 0x10000>; > > + interrupts = <GIC_SPI 26 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>; > > + #mbox-cells = <2>; > > + status = "disabled"; > > + }; > > + > > + v2x_mu: mailbox@47350000 { > > + compatible = "fsl,imx95-mu-v2x"; > > + reg = <0x0 0x47350000 0x0 0x10000>; > > + interrupts = <GIC_SPI 255 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>; > > + #mbox-cells = <2>; > > + }; > > + > > + v2x_mu6: mailbox@47320000 { > > + compatible = "fsl,imx95-mu-v2x"; > > + reg = <0x0 0x47320000 0x0 0x10000>; > > + interrupts = <GIC_SPI 254 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>; > > + #mbox-cells = <2>; > > + }; > > Please sort nodes by address. Yeah. Fix in v4. Thanks, Peng. > > Best regards, > Alexander > > > + }; > > +}; > > > > > > > -- > TQ-Systems GmbH | Mühlstraße 2, Gut Delling | 82229 Seefeld, Germany > Amtsgericht München, HRB 105018 > Geschäftsführer: Detlef Schneider, Rüdiger Stahl, Stefan Schneider > http://www.t/ > q- > group.com%2F&data=05%7C02%7Cpeng.fan%40nxp.com%7C50f2e03eeb9d4 > b5ec44008dc6822023c%7C686ea1d3bc2b4c6fa92cd99c5c301635%7C0%7C > 0%7C638499742474895703%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4 > wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C0%7C% > 7C%7C&sdata=QQTX4gXs3a%2FXizeqgzpaq3n0vmoQRUYkSufNKVu7LE8%3D > &reserved=0 >