* Pantelis Antoniou <panto@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> [150219 10:32]: > > On Feb 19, 2015, at 20:16 , Tony Lindgren <tony@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > Uhh I don't like the idea of duplicating the i2c-omap.c driver under > > arch/arm.. And in general we should initialize things later rather > > than earlier. > > > > What's stopping doing these quirk checks later on time with just > > a regular device driver, something like drivers/misc/bbone-quirks.c? > > > > We have no choice; we are way early in the boot process, right after > the device tree unflattening step. To me it seems the dt patching part should be done with minimal code before any driver like features.. > I’ve toyed with the idea of using early platform devices but the omap-i2c driver > would need some tender love and care to make it work, and I didn’t want to get > bogged down with i2c driver details at this point. ..so how about just parse a kernel cmdline for the quirks to apply based on a version string or similar? That can be easily populated by u-boot or set manually with setenv. That leaves out the need for tinkering with i2c super early in the kernel for revision detection. Regards, Tony -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
