On Thu, Apr 25, 2024 at 09:48:31AM +0200, Patrick Delaunay wrote: > > This patchset removes the unexpected comma in the PWR compatible > "st,stm32mp1,pwr-reg" and uses a new compatible "st,stm32mp1-pwr-reg" > in STM3MP15 device trees. Why? I don't see any warnings from this. Yes, we wouldn't new cases following this pattern, but I don't think it is worth maintaining support for both strings. We're stuck with it. And the only way to maintain forward compatibility is: compatible = "st,stm32mp1-pwr-reg", "st,stm32mp1,pwr-reg"; Rob
