Re: [PATCH 02/10] pwm: Add SI-EN SN3112 PWM support

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





On 4/24/24 17:29, Xilin Wu via B4 Relay wrote:
From: Junhao Xie <bigfoot@xxxxxxxxxxx>

Add a new driver for the SI-EN SN3112 12-channel 8-bit PWM LED controller.

Signed-off-by: Junhao Xie <bigfoot@xxxxxxxxxxx>
---

[...]

+static int sn3112_set_en_reg(struct sn3112 *priv, unsigned int channel,
+			     bool enabled, bool write)
+{
+	unsigned int reg, bit;
+
+	if (channel >= SN3112_CHANNELS)
+		return -EINVAL;
+
+	/* LED_EN1: BIT5:BIT3 = OUT3:OUT1 */
+	if (channel >= 0 && channel <= 2)
+		reg = 0, bit = channel + 3;
+	/* LED_EN2: BIT5:BIT0 = OUT9:OUT4 */
+	else if (channel >= 3 && channel <= 8)
+		reg = 1, bit = channel - 3;
+	/* LED_EN3: BIT2:BIT0 = OUT12:OUT10 */
+	else if (channel >= 9 && channel <= 11)
+		reg = 2, bit = channel - 9;
+	else
+		return -EINVAL;
+
+	dev_dbg(priv->pdev, "channel %u enabled %u\n", channel, enabled);
+	dev_dbg(priv->pdev, "reg %u bit %u\n", reg, bit);
+	if (enabled)
+		set_bit(bit, (ulong *)&priv->pwm_en_reg[reg]);
+	else
+		clear_bit(bit, (ulong *)&priv->pwm_en_reg[reg]);
+	dev_dbg(priv->pdev, "set enable reg %u to %u\n", reg,
+		priv->pwm_en_reg[reg]);
+
+	if (!write)
+		return 0;
+	return sn3112_write_reg(priv, SN3112_REG_PWM_EN + reg,
+				priv->pwm_en_reg[reg]);

This looks like a weird reimplementation of regmap_update_bits


+}
+
+static int sn3112_set_val_reg(struct sn3112 *priv, unsigned int channel,
+			      uint8_t val, bool write)
+{
+	if (channel >= SN3112_CHANNELS)
+		return -EINVAL;
+	priv->pwm_val[channel] = val;
+	dev_dbg(priv->pdev, "set value reg %u to %u\n", channel,
+		priv->pwm_val[channel]);
+
+	if (!write)
+		return 0;

There's only a single call, with write == true

+	return sn3112_write_reg(priv, SN3112_REG_PWM_VAL + channel,
+				priv->pwm_val[channel]);
+}
+
+static int sn3112_write_all(struct sn3112 *priv)
+{
+	int i, ret;
+
+	/* regenerate enable register values */
+	for (i = 0; i < SN3112_CHANNELS; i++) {
+		ret = sn3112_set_en_reg(priv, i, priv->pwm_en[i], false);
+		if (ret != 0)
+			return ret;
+	}
+
+	/* use random value to clear all registers */
+	ret = sn3112_write_reg(priv, SN3112_REG_RESET, 0x66);
+	if (ret != 0)

if (ret) is the same as if (ret != 0)

[...]

+
+	/* use random value to apply changes */
+	ret = sn3112_write_reg(priv, SN3112_REG_APPLY, 0x66);

"a random value"? sounds suspicious..

+	if (ret != 0)
+		return ret;
+
+	dev_dbg(priv->pdev, "reinitialized\n");

Please remove such "got here" messages once you're done with testing
the driver locally

[...]

+
+#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_GPIOLIB)

I'm not sure this would be ever disabled on any embedded system nowadays.
Especially with I2C.

[...]

+
+	dev_info(&client->dev,
+		 "Found SI-EN SN3112 12-channel 8-bit PWM LED controller\n");

This sort of message only makes sense if there's a CHIP_ID register that
you can actually validate. If you bind this driver to a device at the same
expected address, it will say it's there even if it's not.


+	return 0;
+}
+
+static void sn3112_pwm_remove(struct i2c_client *client)
+{
+	struct pwm_chip *chip = i2c_get_clientdata(client);
+	struct sn3112 *priv = pwmchip_get_drvdata(chip);
+
+	dev_dbg(priv->pdev, "remove\n");
+
+	/* set software enable register */
+	sn3112_write_reg(priv, SN3112_REG_ENABLE, 0);
+
+	/* use random value to apply changes */
+	sn3112_write_reg(priv, SN3112_REG_APPLY, 0x66);
+
+#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_GPIOLIB)
+	/* enable hardware shutdown pin */
+	if (priv->sdb)
+		gpiod_set_value(priv->sdb, 1);
+#endif
+
+	/* power-off sn5112 power vdd */
+	regulator_disable(priv->vdd);
+
+	pwmchip_remove(chip);

devm_pwmchip_add?

Konrad




[Index of Archives]     [Device Tree Compilter]     [Device Tree Spec]     [Linux Driver Backports]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux PCI Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Yosemite Backpacking]


  Powered by Linux