Re: [PATCH v2 05/10] arm64: dts: microchip: sparx5_pcb134: align I2C mux node name with bindings

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 11/04/2024 20:27, Rob Herring wrote:
>>  };
>>
>>  &axi {
>> -       i2c0_imux: i2c0-imux@0 {
>> +       i2c0_imux: i2c-mux-0 {
> 
> Doesn't this introduce a new warning with simple-bus.yaml? These
> devices shouldn't be under an AXI bus which should require a
> unit-address.
> 
> All the sft-eth* nodes have the same problem:
> axi@600000000: sfp-eth63: {'compatible': ['sff,sfp'], 'i2c-bus':
> [[91]], 'tx-disable-gpios': [[87, 31, 0, 1]], 'rate-select0-gpios':
> [[87, 31, 1, 0]], 'los-gpios': [[88, 31, 0, 0]], 'mod-def0-gpios':
> [[88, 31, 1, 1]], 'tx-fault-gpios': [[88, 31, 2, 0]], 'phandle':
> [[78]]} should not be valid under {'type': 'object'}
> 

True, this replaces one dtc warning with another, so the new one is:
Warning (simple_bus_reg): /axi@600000000/i2c-mux: missing or empty
reg/ranges property

which I kind of missed, because there are several other sfp nodes
causing the warning, like you mentioned above.

The true solution is to probably bring them out of axi bus, but for that
I would need to try to understand why they were put there in the first
place...


Best regards,
Krzysztof





[Index of Archives]     [Device Tree Compilter]     [Device Tree Spec]     [Linux Driver Backports]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux PCI Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Yosemite Backpacking]


  Powered by Linux