On Sat, Apr 06, 2024 at 09:31:31AM +0530, Manivannan Sadhasivam wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 05, 2024 at 10:31:16AM -0400, Frank Li wrote:
> > On Fri, Apr 05, 2024 at 11:54:26AM +0530, Manivannan Sadhasivam wrote:
> > > On Tue, Mar 19, 2024 at 12:07:15PM -0400, Frank Li wrote:
> > >
> > > PCI: dwc: Add generic MSG TLP support for sending PME_Turn_Off during system suspend
> > >
> > > > Reserve space at end of first IORESOURCE_MEM window as message TLP MMIO
> > > > window. This space's size is 'region_align'.
> > > >
> > > > Set outbound ATU map memory write to send PCI message. So one MMIO write
> > > > can trigger a PCI message, such as PME_Turn_Off.
> > > >
> > > > Add common dwc_pme_turn_off() function.
> > > >
> > > > Call dwc_pme_turn_off() to send out PME_Turn_Off message in general
> > > > dw_pcie_suspend_noirq() if there are not platform callback pme_turn_off()
> > > > exist.
> > > >
> > >
> > > How about:
> > >
> > > "Instead of relying on the vendor specific implementations to send the
> > > PME_Turn_Off message, let's introduce a generic way of sending the message using
> > > the MSG TLP.
> > >
> > > This is achieved by reserving a region for MSG TLP of size 'pci->region_align',
> > > at the end of the first IORESOURCE_MEM window of the host bridge. And then
> > > sending the PME_Turn_Off message during system suspend with the help of iATU.
> > >
> > > It should be noted that this generic implementation is optional for the glue
> > > drivers and can be overridden by a custom 'pme_turn_off' callback."
> > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Frank Li <Frank.Li@xxxxxxx>
> > > > ---
> > > > drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware-host.c | 94 ++++++++++++++++++++++-
> > > > drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware.h | 3 +
> > > > 2 files changed, 93 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware-host.c b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware-host.c
> > > > index 267687ab33cbc..d5723fce7a894 100644
> > > > --- a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware-host.c
> > > > +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware-host.c
> > > > @@ -393,6 +393,31 @@ static int dw_pcie_msi_host_init(struct dw_pcie_rp *pp)
> > > > return 0;
> > > > }
> > > >
> > > > +static void dw_pcie_host_request_msg_tlp_res(struct dw_pcie_rp *pp)
> > > > +{
> > > > + struct dw_pcie *pci = to_dw_pcie_from_pp(pp);
> > > > + struct resource_entry *win;
> > > > + struct resource *res;
> > > > +
> > > > + win = resource_list_first_type(&pp->bridge->windows, IORESOURCE_MEM);
> > > > + if (win) {
> > > > + res = devm_kzalloc(pci->dev, sizeof(*res), GFP_KERNEL);
> > > > + if (!res)
> > > > + return;
> > > > +
> > > > + /* Reserve last region_align block as message TLP space */
> > > > + res->start = win->res->end - pci->region_align + 1;
> > > > + res->end = win->res->end;
> > >
> > > Don't you need to adjust the host bridge window size and end address?
> >
> > Needn't. request_resource will reserve it from bridge window. Like malloc,
> > if you malloc to get a region of memory, which will never get by malloc
> > again utill you call free.
> >
>
> Hmm, will that modify the window->res->end address and size?
No. This windows already reported to pci system before this function. It is
not good to modify window-res-end. It just add child resource like below.
windows is root resource, which will create may child when call
request_resource.
bridge -> windows
child1 -> msg
child2 -> pci ep1
child3 -> pci_ep2.
...
Although you see whole bridge window, 'msg' already used and put under root
resource, new pci devices will never use 'msg' resource.
If change windows->res->end here, I worry about it may broken resource
tree.
>
> > >
> > > > + res->name = "msg";
> > > > + res->flags = win->res->flags | IORESOURCE_BUSY;
> > > > +
> > >
> > > Shouldn't this resource be added back to the host bridge?
> >
> > No, this resource will reserver for msg only for whole bridge life cycle.
> > Genenally alloc resource only happen at PCI devices probe. All pci space
> > will be fixed after system probe.
> >
>
> I don't think so. This resource still belongs to the host bridge, so we should
> add it back.
When add back? It was reserved at bridge probe. When bridge remove, all
resource will released.
>
> - Mani
>
> --
> மணிவண்ணன் சதாசிவம்
