On Wed, 3 Apr 2024 at 15:53, Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@xxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Wed, Apr 03, 2024 at 01:11:06PM +0200, Ulf Hansson wrote: > > Recently we extended the binding for protocol@13 to allow it to be modelled > > as a generic performance domain. In a way to promote using the new binding, > > let's update the examples. > > > > Does it make sense to keep one DVFS example with #clock-cells until we > mark it as deprecated ? Otherwise it may be confusing as the binding still > lists. Or leave some comment in the example or something, I am open for > suggestions. I am certainly fine with either way! However, if we intend to make #clock-cells deprecated down the road, maybe it's better to start avoiding the use of it already now. That said, what do you think of following up $subject patch with an update to Juno's dts(i) to move to #power-domains-cells too? That would mean we get a nice reference for how to use this too. > > Other than that, > > Acked-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@xxxxxxx> Are you picking this via your scmi tree, or which route is this going? > > -- > Regards, > Sudeep Kind regards Uffe
