On 02/04/2024 21:27, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 02, 2024 at 08:32:40PM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> The Espressobin Ultra DTS includes Espressobin DTSI which defines
>> ethernet-switch@1 node. The Ultra DTS overrides "reg" to 3, but that
>> leaves still old unit address which conflicts with the new phy@1 node
>> (W=1 dtc warning):
>>
>> armada-3720-espressobin.dtsi:148.29-203.4: Warning (unique_unit_address_if_enabled): /soc/internal-regs@d0000000/mdio@32004/ethernet-switch@1: duplicate unit-address (also used in node /soc/internal-regs@d0000000/mdio@32004/ethernet-phy@1)
>>
>> Fix this by deleting ethernet-switch@1 node and merging original node
>> with code from Ultra DTS into new ethernet-switch@3.
>
> That is a bit ugly, having the exact same code twice.
>
> Could the bulk of the switch node be put into a .dtsi file, and then
> included as needed
There are several overrides/new nodes in espresso ultra, so this is not
the same code.
>
> &mdio {
> switch0: ethernet-switch@1 {
> reg = <1>;
> include "armada-3720-espressobin-switch.dtsi"
And this DTSI would be with what? No device node? That's not readable.
>
> }
> }
Best regards,
Krzysztof
